<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fundraising Commons Blog</title>
    <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://fundcommons.org/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Open, practical guidance for building an advancement data operation you can trust, written for shops that are short on staff and budget.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Programs, beneficiaries, and grants: modeling the half of your data that isn&apos;t fundraising</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/programs-beneficiaries-grants-data-model/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/programs-beneficiaries-grants-data-model/</guid>
      <description>Programs, beneficiaries, grants, and impact belong in the same data model as gifts. Connecting money to mission starts with one shared spine. Here&apos;s how.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>verticals</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>mission</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Grateful patient fundraising and HIPAA: what donor data can a hospital foundation use?</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/grateful-patient-fundraising-hipaa/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/grateful-patient-fundraising-hipaa/</guid>
      <description>HIPAA allows grateful patient fundraising with a limited data set and a required opt-out. Here&apos;s how to model that boundary so you can prove it&apos;s respected.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>healthcare</category>
      <category>verticals</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>governance</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tithes, pledges, and three databases: mapping church giving to a common model</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/church-giving-common-data-model/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/church-giving-common-data-model/</guid>
      <description>Yes, church giving maps to a common data model: members are constituents, tithes are gifts, pledge campaigns are commitments. Here&apos;s the full crosswalk.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>faith-based</category>
      <category>verticals</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>acdm</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who is the Advancement Common Data Model for?</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/who-is-acdm-for/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/who-is-acdm-for/</guid>
      <description>ACDM is for any organization that raises money: advancement shops in the beta today, with churches, hospitals, and human-services nonprofits designed in.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>acdm</category>
      <category>verticals</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Governance Firewall: Who Controls the Standard?</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/governance-firewall-who-controls/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/governance-firewall-who-controls/</guid>
      <description>A data standard stewarded by a vendor is only as good as its governance. Here is how we build a firewall between funding and decision-making.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>governance</category>
      <category>acdm</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Competitors Win by Conforming to ACDM</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-competitors-win-by-conforming/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-competitors-win-by-conforming/</guid>
      <description>Why would a CRM vendor or consultant build to a standard funded by their competitor? Because standardizing reduces integration costs and builds trust.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>governance</category>
      <category>interoperability</category>
      <category>acdm</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adopting ACDM Without Rigason: The Zero-Vendor Blueprint</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/adopting-acdm-without-rigason/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/adopting-acdm-without-rigason/</guid>
      <description>You don&apos;t need Rigason to benefit from the Advancement Common Data Model. Here is how to build a vendor-neutral data layer on top of Salesforce or Dynamics.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>acdm</category>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
      <category>data-portability</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why the fundraising sector can&apos;t learn from itself, and what a commons would change</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/why-the-sector-cant-learn-from-itself/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/why-the-sector-cant-learn-from-itself/</guid>
      <description>Nonprofits can&apos;t benchmark against each other because data is trapped twice over and comparing has meant exposing donors. A commons changes both. Here&apos;s the whole argument.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>mission</category>
      <category>benchmarking</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How an open standard stays neutral when a vendor funds it</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-an-open-standard-stays-neutral/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-an-open-standard-stays-neutral/</guid>
      <description>Can a data standard funded by a vendor really be neutral? Yes, if neutrality is built, not claimed: open governance, conformance anyone can earn, and a tested way to leave.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>governance</category>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Synthetic donor data: how to test cadences and policies safely</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/synthetic-donor-data/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/synthetic-donor-data/</guid>
      <description>Synthetic donor data is artificial records that mirror your real data&apos;s patterns but describe no actual person, so you can test cadences, models, and policies without risk.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>analytics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Donor data privacy under GDPR and CCPA: what advancement teams need to know</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-data-privacy-gdpr-ccpa/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-data-privacy-gdpr-ccpa/</guid>
      <description>If you hold data about EU/UK or California donors, GDPR and CCPA likely apply wherever your org sits. Here&apos;s what advancement teams need to know, in plain terms.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>governance</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI governance for donor data: a starter policy any shop can adopt</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/ai-governance-starter-policy/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/ai-governance-starter-policy/</guid>
      <description>AI governance for donor data doesn&apos;t need a legal team. It needs a one-page policy answering a few concrete questions before any AI touches donor records. Here&apos;s the template.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>governance</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Propensity and capacity scores: what they are, and what they&apos;re not</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/propensity-and-capacity-scores/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/propensity-and-capacity-scores/</guid>
      <description>Propensity is how likely someone is to give; capacity is how much they could give. They sit on different axes, and confusing them is the most common scoring mistake. Here&apos;s the difference.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>analytics</category>
      <category>ml</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Privacy-preserving analytics: what &quot;raw donor data never leaves your walls&quot; really means</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/privacy-preserving-analytics-explained/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/privacy-preserving-analytics-explained/</guid>
      <description>Privacy-preserving analytics sends the computation to your data, not your data to the computation. Only aggregates leave; raw donor records stay inside. Here&apos;s how it works.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>analytics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From hunch to score: prioritizing a gift officer&apos;s week with data</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/from-hunch-to-score/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/from-hunch-to-score/</guid>
      <description>How do you prioritize a gift officer&apos;s portfolio? Replace gut feel with a transparent score built on clean, connected data, so the week&apos;s calls have a defensible order.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>analytics</category>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agentic AI for fundraising: a glossary for nonprofit leaders</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/agentic-ai-glossary-for-leaders/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/agentic-ai-glossary-for-leaders/</guid>
      <description>Agentic AI means software that takes actions, not just answers questions. Here&apos;s a plain-language glossary (agent, grounding, guardrails, hallucination) for fundraising leaders.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>future-proofing</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to benchmark fundraising against peers without exposing a single donor record</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/benchmark-without-exposing-donor-data/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/benchmark-without-exposing-donor-data/</guid>
      <description>You can compare retention and giving against peers without sharing donor data: compute metrics locally, pool only aggregates. Here&apos;s how it works, step by step.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>benchmarking</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One year in: what building an open fundraising commons taught us</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/one-year-in-open-fundraising-commons/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/one-year-in-open-fundraising-commons/</guid>
      <description>A year ago we said the sector can&apos;t learn from itself and small shops get left behind. Here&apos;s what&apos;s real, what the first year taught us, and what&apos;s still early. Honestly.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>governance</category>
      <category>mission</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What one misfired AI agent costs you: the duplicate-donor problem at scale</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/cost-of-a-misfired-ai-agent/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/cost-of-a-misfired-ai-agent/</guid>
      <description>When AI runs on bad CRM data it doesn&apos;t fail quietly. It executes the error across your whole list. Here&apos;s what a single duplicate donor costs once an agent acts on it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The board-meeting number: campaign reporting that survives scrutiny</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/the-board-meeting-number/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/the-board-meeting-number/</guid>
      <description>The single campaign figure you present to the board survives scrutiny only if you decided in advance what counts: pledges, which date, deduped, one source. Here&apos;s how.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>campaign-reporting</category>
      <category>metrics</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Before the year-end rush: the data checklist that protects your campaign numbers</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/year-end-data-checklist/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/year-end-data-checklist/</guid>
      <description>Year-end giving is a stress test for your data. A short checklist covering gift dates, dedup, DAF and match attribution, and pinned definitions keeps your campaign number trustworthy.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>campaign-reporting</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future-proofing nonprofit technology: a leader&apos;s guide to not betting on the wrong platform</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/future-proofing-nonprofit-technology/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/future-proofing-nonprofit-technology/</guid>
      <description>You can&apos;t predict the next disruption, so don&apos;t try to pick the platform that survives it. Future-proof by composition: an open, portable foundation that adapts. Here&apos;s how.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>future-proofing</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACDM vs. NPSP, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud, and Microsoft&apos;s NCDM</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/acdm-vs-npsp-nonprofit-cloud-ncdm/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/acdm-vs-npsp-nonprofit-cloud-ncdm/</guid>
      <description>How does ACDM relate to NPSP, Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud, and Microsoft&apos;s Nonprofit Common Data Model? ACDM is a neutral layer that extends NCDM and maps to the others.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>acdm</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>interoperability</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AI-ready fundraising data: what it actually means (a readiness checklist)</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/ai-ready-fundraising-data/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/ai-ready-fundraising-data/</guid>
      <description>AI-ready data isn&apos;t a product you switch on. It&apos;s four properties: clean, defined, connected, governed. Here&apos;s a practical checklist to see if your data is ready for AI.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>future-proofing</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You can&apos;t run AI agents on rumors with a logo</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/cant-run-ai-agents-on-rumors/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/cant-run-ai-agents-on-rumors/</guid>
      <description>Are AI agents safe to use on donor data? Only when that data is clean and governed. An agent acting on a duplicate fails at scale. Here&apos;s what AI-readiness takes.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>future-proofing</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Constituent 360 is a destination, not a dashboard you buy</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/constituent-360-is-a-destination/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/constituent-360-is-a-destination/</guid>
      <description>A constituent 360 view is a single, complete picture of a supporter: gifts, relationships, and interactions over time. You earn it by modeling engagement, not buying a tool.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>analytics</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The monolith trap: buying a whole platform for one feature</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/the-monolith-trap/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/the-monolith-trap/</guid>
      <description>Need reporting, or a place to analyze, or AI? The usual answer is to buy a whole platform. Here&apos;s why that&apos;s the monolith trap, and how to add just the one capability.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DAF gifts: who&apos;s the legal donor, and why your attribution breaks</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/daf-gifts-legal-donor/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/daf-gifts-legal-donor/</guid>
      <description>For a donor-advised fund gift, the legal donor is the fund sponsor, not the individual who recommended it. Record it backwards and receipts, totals, and stewardship break.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>definitions</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Donor data portability: how to test whether your data is really yours</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-data-portability-test/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-data-portability-test/</guid>
      <description>Your donor data is portable if you can move your full, meaningful history into another system and it&apos;s still true. Here&apos;s the drill that tells you, not the export button.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-portability</category>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recurring donor churn: why your denominator is wrong</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/recurring-donor-churn-denominator/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/recurring-donor-churn-denominator/</guid>
      <description>Recurring churn is the rate at which recurring commitments stop being fulfilled. Its denominator is expected gifts, not received ones. Counting only what arrived hides it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>metrics</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gift date vs. entry date vs. batch date: why your fiscal totals never reconcile</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/gift-date-vs-entry-date-vs-batch-date/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/gift-date-vs-entry-date-vs-batch-date/</guid>
      <description>Gift date is when the donor gave; entry date when staff keyed it; batch date when it posted. Use them interchangeably and fiscal totals won&apos;t reconcile. Here&apos;s the fix.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
      <category>metrics</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to avoid CRM vendor lock-in without switching systems</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/avoid-crm-vendor-lock-in/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/avoid-crm-vendor-lock-in/</guid>
      <description>You don&apos;t have to leave your CRM to escape lock-in. Make your data portable where it sits: map it to an open, neutral shape. Here&apos;s how, in three moves.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
      <category>data-portability</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A pledge is not a payment: commitment vs. transaction explained</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/a-pledge-is-not-a-payment/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/a-pledge-is-not-a-payment/</guid>
      <description>A pledge is a promise to give; a payment is the money arriving. Collapse the two and you get false lapses and missed churn. Here&apos;s the distinction that fixes it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>definitions</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A good data foundation shouldn&apos;t need a big budget</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/data-foundation-without-big-budget/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/data-foundation-without-big-budget/</guid>
      <description>Can a small shop afford good data infrastructure? Yes. The trustworthy part is mostly discipline, not spend. Definitions, hygiene, and an open standard are free.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>small-shops</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
      <category>mission</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Donor retention rate: the definition most shops get subtly wrong</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-retention-rate-definition/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/donor-retention-rate-definition/</guid>
      <description>Donor retention is the share of last period&apos;s donors who gave again this period. The subtle error is the denominator: it should be last year&apos;s cohort, not this year&apos;s.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>metrics</category>
      <category>definitions</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is a vendor-neutral common data model, and why fundraising needs one</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/vendor-neutral-common-data-model/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/vendor-neutral-common-data-model/</guid>
      <description>A vendor-neutral common data model is a shared, open way to describe your data that no software company owns, so records mean the same thing everywhere and can move.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>vendor-lock-in</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is the Advancement Common Data Model (ACDM)?</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/what-is-acdm/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/what-is-acdm/</guid>
      <description>ACDM is an open, vendor-neutral way to describe fundraising data so it stays portable and comparable across CRMs. Here&apos;s what it is and what it isn&apos;t.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>acdm</category>
      <category>data-model</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Soft credit vs. hard credit: who actually gave?</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/soft-credit-vs-hard-credit/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/soft-credit-vs-hard-credit/</guid>
      <description>Hard credit is the legal donor of record; soft credit recognizes someone else&apos;s role in the same gift. One gift, recorded once, can credit more than one person. Here&apos;s how.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>definitions</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The six objects every advancement CRM has, under different names</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/six-objects-every-advancement-crm/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/six-objects-every-advancement-crm/</guid>
      <description>Constituent, gift, designation, campaign, relationship, interaction. Every fundraising CRM keeps the same six objects under different labels. Learn them once.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>data-model</category>
      <category>acdm</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What &quot;lapsed donor&quot; actually means, and why you must write it down</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/what-lapsed-donor-actually-means/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/what-lapsed-donor-actually-means/</guid>
      <description>A lapsed donor gave before but not within an agreed recent window. But &quot;lapsed&quot; is a definition, not a flag. Pin the window, the gift types, and pledges. Here&apos;s how.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>definitions</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why your reports disagree depending on who runs them</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/why-your-reports-disagree/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/why-your-reports-disagree/</guid>
      <description>Two staff run the same report and get two numbers. The cause isn&apos;t bad data. It&apos;s undocumented definitions. Here&apos;s why fundraising reports drift, and the fix.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>definitions</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;How many donors do we have?&quot; Why one question has three answers</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-many-donors-do-we-have/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/how-many-donors-do-we-have/</guid>
      <description>Ask three people how many donors you have and you&apos;ll get three numbers. Here&apos;s why &quot;active donor count&quot; drifts, and the one habit that makes it agree.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>definitions</category>
      <category>metrics</category>
      <category>data-hygiene</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trust your numbers: why we started the Fundraising Commons</title>
      <link>https://fundcommons.org/blog/trust-your-numbers-why-we-started/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fundcommons.org/blog/trust-your-numbers-why-we-started/</guid>
      <description>Fundraising Commons is an open, vendor-neutral data standard plus free education, so any advancement team can trust its numbers and act on them. Here&apos;s why we built it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>mission</category>
      <category>leadership</category>
      <category>governance</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
